Wednesday, April 3, 2013

Calvin's Reference Interview


In this Calvin and Hobbes cartoon by Bill Watterson, Calvin doesn't find what he needs at his public library.  This raises some questions about collection decisions and PDA:

  • How should libraries who feel committed to PDA respond to requests such as Calvin's? 
  • How are PDA systems and policies crafted to keep libraries from buying books they might feel are not a good use of their resources (like books on popular graffiti profanity)?
  • How do we respond in a way that will keep patrons from feel like they don't know what the library is spending their money on?

Sunday, March 31, 2013

PDA and a New Landscape for Librarians?


As Les has offered in his post below, the library landscape has indeed changed, whether or not the collection development tool of patron-driven acquisitions is here to stay, and he leaves us with a question about what the future may hold.  As we have engaged in these initial explorations of PDA, I see a future that is quite bright.  We are in the middle of an information and technology sea change, which we could not have predicted even just a few years ago, and which will no doubt move in future directions we cannot yet predict – and professional librarians must embrace this change and move in our own directions that will allow us to lead and serve in relevant ways.  PDA is one of the tools that will allow us to navigate this journey with creativity and innovation, and in relationship with the aspect of our libraries that matters most – the people who use them!

Dennis Dillon (2011) puts it this way: “The library is no longer the only doorway to scarce information; instead, it is one information room in a very large house that is overflowing with information;” and a tool such as PDA allows libraries “to elevate their sights so they can make more significant, more professional contributions that have a wider effect on what information their users can access”  (p. 191).  The kind of librarian-patron collaboration that is at the heart of PDA is an important means toward creating stronger collections – relevant for now, and relevant for the next generation of users (Dillon, 2011, p. 193).

With sights thus elevated and a portion of time now available for other professional contributions, the librarian may use “his or her freed-up time to work on improving access, discovery and the library’s relevancy” (p. 192).  Somewhat ironically, while PDA is a new tool that helps to grow the library’s collection (albeit in a different medium), it is also a tool that helps the librarian to shift focus from previously essential tasks around collection development, so s/he may now consider different and better ways to lead the library of today and tomorrow, in service to the people who use that library.

Writing about today’s library world, Andy Burkhardt, a.k.a. Information Tyrannosaur (2013), reminds us that libraries can be so very focused on “stuff” (even digital stuff counts as stuff); yet “while this stuff and its access and organization are still important to the mission of libraries, if we lose sight of the human side of the library, we fail our users and ourselves” (p. 14).  Burkhardt encourages us instead to see the world through what he calls “a human-centered librarianship,” which is “essential for navigating change and addressing the new challenges that face us” (p. 14, emphasis in original).

As one example, he notes that at Champlain College Library, where he is Assistant Director for Digital Strategy, the collection is enhanced through the work of a “scholarly resource and academic outreach librarian,” who builds relationships with the faculty and helps them to develop the curriculum and educational experience for students.  This shift in focus from stuff-centeredness to human-centeredness helps to make it clear that the relationships matter, more so than the collection itself (2103, p. 14).  Building off of this model, I would suggest that PDA can be a good step in such relationship building with the entire user community (even thought it’s still focused on stuff!)  The librarian-patron collaboration that Dillon notes above doesn’t just help make a collection stronger – it can help to make a library community stronger, perhaps especially if library users (faculty in particular) are aware of the role that their choices play in building the library’s information resources.  Further, as librarians begin to analyze PDA trends, they can use these findings as a helpful outreach and relationship building tool, connecting with faculty and students around their current work and interests and using that information and those relationships to enhance the library’s role in the overall educational experience.

And even as PDA offers us a chance to make our “stuff collection” more human-centered, the time and money it can save us also affords librarians an opportunity to focus our energies elsewhere and imagine other ways that the library can serve its community.  Many of today’s academic libraries, for instance, are listening carefully – taking space that might otherwise be used for print collections and re-designing it as “learning commons” or “information commons” that meet students’ desires for flexible study space, collaboration tools, coffee shops, writing programs, additional computer terminals, private study rooms, and much more.  (The Champlain College Library even responded to students’ “tweeted” suggestions by offering “puppy therapy” to help students de-stress during finals week (Burkhardt, 2013, p. 16)  J ).

Burkhardt, the “Information Tyrannosaur,” offers an essential reminder that as professional librarians, our “core business is not books, collections or access.  The core business of libraries is human learning, curiosity and knowledge” (2013, p.17).  With that reminder about our shared mission, are you comfortable with picking up a tool like PDA, and venturing out into a new librarian’s landscape?


References

Dillon, D. (2011).  PDA and Libraries Today and Tomorrow. In David A. Swords (Ed.), Patron-Driven Acquisitions: History and Best Practices (pp. 191-195).  Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Saur.

Burkhardt, A.  (2013, April). Libraries and the Information Food Chain.  ILA Reporter, Vol. 31 (2), pp. 14-17.

Shifting the Paradigm: The Future of Public Driven Acquisition

Discussing what effect PDA will have on libraries in the future is largely opinion. For the profusely negative person, PDA is an affront to the concept of libraries that will surely undermine them. The more positive person will note the effectiveness and ease for the user. While only time will tell if the sunny or gloom n' doom scenarios will play out, what can be assessed is the effect that PDA has already had and whether or not that is positive.

Other posts on this blog have already discussed the good and the bad of PDA and what might happen. But what has already changed, has it changed for the better and is it likely to change back?
The most dramatic change is not about libraries so much as it is about publishers. Publishers have been reliant on a system that is not really efficient. Publishers push a book and then move on. There may be no choice but to get access by buying lots of what publishers have decided is important. They have always sold their materials upfront and cared less about what happens down the road for that book, instead focusing on other editions of the same title.
The problem PDA presents, is that patrons will decide what is bought and when. Publishers will have a lessened ability to sell things in advance. In this way, PDA has already changed the landscape. Patrons have more of a choice about what gets bought. Whether this is good or bad remains to be seen, but publishers have relied on their ability to push and promote things without others having such a good look at alternatives. Much like the music industry, the publishing industry has been caught by some rapid changes in tech and instead of crying about how unfair that is, they will have to adapt or die.

PDA does have an effect on booksales and even its proponents admit to this. But publishers can take advantage of the situation and use PDA as a marketing tool. Publishers like Random House are using better metadata to increase the profiles of their catalogs and allowing for feedback and links to similar books for the patron who also has the ability to review items. In the future, libraries may even get commissions for referring patrons to other sites.

Some of this solves the issues about libraries helping patrons discover new things, but it also raises the issue about the increasing commercialization of the library with its connections to markets like amazon.com.

Publishers are trying to make books more discoverable by upping their profiles in library catalogs which is a good start for them. It also has advantages for the patron although they run the risk of becoming a consumer. This is not necessarily the end of libraries as we know them, but the landscape has changed. What other alterations are likely in the future?

References

Anderson, Rick. "What Patron-Driven Acquisition (PDA) Does and Doesn’t Mean: An FAQ." The Scholarly Kitchen. N.p., 31 May 2011. Web. 31 Mar. 2013. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/05/31/what-patron-driven-acquisition-pda-does-and-doesnt-mean-an-faq/ 


Esposito, Joseph. "The Problem of Discovery for Patron-driven Acquisitions (PDA)." The Scholarly Kitchen. N.p., 12 June 2012. Web. 31 Mar. 2013. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/06/12/the-problem-of-discovery-for-patron-driven-acquisitions-pda/

 

Saturday, March 30, 2013

The Problem With PDA.

Patron driven acquisitions are a heavily disputed topic, often because people don't know what that means or just what they accomplish. If you have been paying attention to the blog posts, you should have a good idea of what PDA is.  It might not be wise to start reading this blog with a post on the cons of PDA, but if you can if you are a negative sort.

For the academic librarian, making educated guesses about what patrons will need while balancing a budget is not the easiest prospect. Would it not be great if the patron told you what they wanted and then had you order it? It would be like working in a bookstore where you can order what you can't find but you don't have to pay for it because the library picks up the tab. That works very well for the patron, but maybe not for the library and its budget.
Even fans of PDA have had to admit that while this is the model, it is not helping save money (Anderson 2011). It is a terrific system for the cash strapped student, but not the institution.

While the system of PDA that is currently in use has advantages for the academic librarian, there is still a pitfall that affects them as well as it would public libraries. The patron should have access to the book purchasing aspect of the library. Without, a community of some sort to serve, there is no library after all. It would be snobbish to assume that the people are not clever enough to know what is good for them. But as Umberto Eco said "the whole idea of a library is based on a misunderstanding: that the reader goes into the library to find a book whose title he knows." Its real purpose, he said, "is to discover books of whose existence the reader has no idea." (Fister 2010)
What we run the risk of losing, is that great feeling anyone in LIS should know, where you walk to through the shelves looking for the book you wanted and finding other books you didn't know existed. This may sound alarmist, but PDA turns the library into a walk in version of Amazon.com where you are reliant upon the similar books recommendations, should you bother to look at them.

Does PDA also turn the patron into a customer? Not exactly, customers pay for things. But if customer demand is the determining factor for books being purchased, the progressive librarian must take notice. Librarians have had to fight against the money of private interests influencing what books the library holds. With PDA, the librarian has to be concerned with the patrons immediate need deciding what they want instead of supplying the patron with new and interesting things they were unaware of.

The effect upon publishers, the cost, and the other problems that proponents all admit exist make one wonder if the convenience of PDA is worth the trouble and won't cause more problems down the road. Yes, the librarian must give people what they want, but the librarian must also educate people with things they were unaware of. They must supply the patron with what they need as well as what they want.

References

Anderson, Rick. "What Patron-Driven Acquisition (PDA) Does and Doesn’t Mean: An FAQ." Web log post. The Scholarly Kitchen. N.p., 31 May 2011. Web. 31 Mar. 2013. http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/05/31/what-patron-driven-acquisition-pda-does-and-doesnt-mean-an-faq

Fister, Barbara. "Problematizing Patron-Driven Acquisitions | Peer to Peer Review." Library Journal Archive (2010): n. pag. Problematizing Patron-Driven Acquisitions | Peer to Peer Review. 11 Nov. 2010. Web. 31 Mar. 2013. http://www.libraryjournal.com/lj/communityacademiclibraries/887739-419/problematizing_patron-driven_acquisitions__peer.html.csp







PDA in the Public Library


While most of the use, development, research and literature about patron-driven acquisitions focus on academic libraries as the setting, public libraries too are changing both the way they think about acquisitions and the process they use for collection development.  This, of course, looks different than the goals and process that academic libraries have.  Many academic libraries have systems set up for direct buying of e-books by patrons with a librarian approving or reviewing a particular purchase.  Public libraries, however, have been slower to embrace this system.  Academic libraries exist to server a very small community with a very particular purpose compared to a public library who has a mission to inform and entertain a great diversity of people.  Public libraries often have much smaller budgets as well and less of their patrons may be able to fully utilize e-books.

However, libraries are being influenced by the philosophy of a collection being built by patron’s specific requests, rather than by an expert librarian making informed guesses about what users may want.  Many public libraries recognize that fact that their patrons are expecting information at a quicker speed and if they cannot get it at the library they may very well go elsewhere (Mejdrich 2011).  Also, if new purchases are based on past circulation, the library only buys books for its current users. 

To meet this new situation, some public libraries have set up systems to purchase patron requested books in a timely manner, often connecting their PDA system with Inter-Library Loan.  Others are doing similar e-book purchasing to academic libraries.  One example of a PDA/ILL system is Hillsboro Public Library in Oregon (Mejdrich 2011).  There they first set up a system where an ILL request would create an automatic purchase request.  An acquisitions librarian would review the request and if she/he approved the book would be bought rather than borrowed for another institution.  However, because new book orders were made only once a month and there were several back and forth steps in the process, the average wait for the book was fifty-six days (Majdrich 2011).  The library decided to strive for a quicker turnaround time by creating a “Request to Buy” program.  The ILL staff was empowered to make purchases if the requested materials met several broad guidelines, cutting out several steps in the process.  Also, new purchase orders went out once a week rather than once a month.  This new system resulted in only a twelve day wait for newly purchased material, comparable to the average ILL wait (Majdrich 2011).

PDA of e-books can also interact with ILL systems.  The patron would have the option to either request the hardcopy of the book from another library in the system, or could download the e-book version and thereby purchasing the electronic copy for the library.  Esposito (2012) argues that this is a much more cost effective way to use ILL and to purchase new e-books.  ILL dollars are not spent on books that could be instantaneously accessed by the patron online and at the end of the day the library gets a new book for its expenditure (Esposito 2012).

Systems like the one Esposito argues for or that are in place at Hillsboro Public Library often make public librarians nervous.  It takes some of the control of collection development out of their hands and it sometimes seems uncertain if the general public can handle the responsibility of choosing what books the library purchases.  No library wants to end up with one hundred copies of the new bestselling thriller due to patrons’ over-enthusiasm.  However, PDA can be very helpful for public libraries as they try to meet specific community needs, particularly for “specific ethnic, national, or language communities whose reading interests might be otherwise underrepresented in library acquisitions” (Brantley 2012).  Librarians hopefully know what these members of their community want, but language and cultural barriers may prevent them from knowing as well as they should.  An acquisitions set up that is more patron-driven can help institutions over those barriers.

Questions to consider:
-What else could PDA do for public libraries?  How else could it be integrated?
-Do you think this is a helpful way to go about building a public library collection?  Why or why not?

References
Brantley, P. (2012). The Ultimate Discovery Engine.  Publishers Weekly. Retrieved from http://blogs.publishersweekly.com/blogs/PWxyz/2012/01/09/ultimate-discovery-engine/

Esposito, J. (2012). PDA and Inter-Library Loan. The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2012/03/13/pda-and-inter-library-loan/

Mejdrich, K. (2011). The Library Collection as Service. OLA Quarterly,17(3), 7-8.  Retrieved from http://data.memberclicks.com/site/ola/olaq_17no3.pdf

The Promise of PDA


As Faith’s introductory post suggests, Patron-Driven Acquisitions (PDA) is not a perfect model for developing a library’s collection, nor is it universally accepted. However, PDA is a very promising option for academic and research libraries, for a number of reasons – several of which I will outline below (and perhaps our readers will add to this list, as you explore this topic with us!) 

At the core of the promise of PDA lies an essential component – the patron!  A library is not a library without the people who inhabit it.  As academic librarian and library blogger Rick Anderson (2011) reminds us, “the purpose of the collection isn’t to be a great collection; it’s to connect patrons with exactly what they need.”  A deep and broad collection, developed with care by subject-expert librarians and faculty who have the rich past, current landscape and future possibilities of various disciplines in mind is a great gift to teaching, learning and research, without a doubt.  But from a user perspective, such "just in case” collections do have their limitations – and PDA opens up new, 21st century possibilities in a powerful way!


PDA meets patrons’ actual information and workflow needs.
           
Imagine that it is a Thursday, around 1am.  You (night owl that you are) are working on a project for class, and you have found a number of related materials in the library’s online catalog, but only one that seems like it would be helpful for your current needs.  You could put it on hold online, and head to the library tomorrow to retrieve the book; plus, once there, you might certainly find additional items that would be of use on the shelves (there are a good number of print resources that go decades back, related to this general topic).  However, you’ve also “googled” your topic and found other academic resources, both ebooks and articles, that would be even more relevant for your current research – but your library doesn’t have those as part of its collection.  You could fill out an interlibrary loan request, but who knows exactly how long that would take…

But now imagine that you can log into the library's website from home (at 1am on a Thursday), and search a catalogue that has been expanded to include tens (if not hundreds!) of thousands of additional titles, both ebooks and journal articles - because of the library’s recent decision to include PDA in its acquisition procedures.  As you search the catalogue, you find a number of relevant items (you may even find yourself surprised by this wealth of information!) – and what’s more, you can download the full text version right away!

Such are the differences, for the library patron, between the “just in case” and “just in time” collection approaches that Faith outlined above.  The "just in case" collection indeed has a wealth of materials – but they may not be as immediately relevant as the researcher might like them to be.  The "just in time" approach of PDA has far greater potential to meet each patron's information needs, both in their specificity, and in the actual moment of need.

Professional librarians may understandably have concerns about the quality of additions to the collection, with such a “just in time” approach.  However, at least one study has indicated that librarians need not be concerned about the quality of the items selected by patrons; though the patron’s aims may be different than the librarian’s (i.e., satisfying an immediate need, instead of focusing on the long-term contributions the library collection will make to teaching, learning and research), patron selected materials appear to be comparably appropriate in terms of content and recommended use within an academic library environment (Shen, 2011, p. 216).  Further, with such an approach, perhaps precisely because most patron’s choices will be based upon what they are doing in the classroom or for current academic research, “not only are the requesting patrons’ needs satisfied, but also it is highly likely that those books will interest other patrons in the future” (Nixon, 2010, p. 120).


PDA increases access to – and accessing of – information.
           
If you’re like me (since pretty much all of the readers of this blog are preparing to become professional librarians!), you may relish the opportunity to wander through a library’s stacks whenever you have the time; you never know what you might discover there!  The possibilities are great, and there’s nothing comparable to that familiar sight, smell and feel of so much knowledge housed in one place (just in case).  And, if you’re like me, you probably spend a good amount of time on the Internet, and you are very comfortable with the ins-and-outs of searching for relevant materials on the Web – not to mention a library’s online catalog.  PDA provides the opportunity to combine a library’s print resources with so many more important learning, teaching and research opportunities, via an expansive electronic environment.  As Rick Lugg (2011) points out, when libraries incorporate PDA, “a much broader array of titles is potentially available in a discovery environment with which users are already familiar” (p. 13).  The possibilities for access to information are that much greater, because so many more (again, perhaps hundreds of thousands more) titles are “discoverable” than in a traditional “just in case” model, because the catalogue of titles, both ebooks and academic journals, expands far beyond the library’s material holdings.

Lugg (2011) has also noted that access to this familiar, expansive electronic information environment will likely result in library users not just having the potential to access, but actually accessing, a greater amount of information.  Lugg reports that in a recent study of an academic library, his company “encountered graphic evidence” of the significant use of electronic, downloadable library resources: “In one year, this library circulated 426,937 items, including renewals.  Even at this seemingly robust level, circulation had declined 45.9% between 2003 and 2009.  In the same year, however, the library experienced 2,422,024 downloads.”  This stunning 6:1 ratio indicates a “preference for remote electronic access over physical check-out” (p. 9).  To this blogger, it also indicates a great hunger on the behalf of academic library users for access to the wealth of information that is available across the vast network of information resources.  PDA helps libraries offer just that! 

What is more, PDA increases access to information in a diversity of settings, across the nation and the globe.  Steiner and Berry (2011), sharing their experiences with PDA from an international context, offer this testimony:

“One of the challenges for the [Azerbaijan Diplomatic Academy] library, as with all new libraries was the need to have a viable collection from day one.  Traditionally, building a viable opening-day collection takes years and for a library of any scale, millions of dollars.  With PDA, literally overnight, the library’s catalogue could (and did, in fact) go from 10,000 items to over 150,000 items, and at no [immediate] cost” (p. 88). 

Freedom of information can be at stake here, too; in certain international settings, students, faculty and researchers can now have access – via PDA – to information that might be considered controversial or sensitive.  In this electronic environment, such materials are available but not on the shelf, with a greatly decreased risk of being stumbled upon by someone who might seek to censor them; and because such materials are not actually “owned” by the library, if they do ultimately need to be removed the library may do so, at no cost to the institution (Steiner and Berry, 2011, p. 87).


PDA meets people where they’re at – literally! 

All of the bloggers on this site – and many of those who will join us in conversation – are distance learners, with Wayne State University’s School of Library and Information Science.  PDA offers distance students like us the opportunity to access a vast wealth of library resources from miles away.  PDA can also be an important library offering for students, teachers and researchers who may not be exclusively working in an online environment, but whose life circumstances and workflow habits are such that access to information when they need it, wherever they are, may be a tremendous gift.  From our 1am researcher above, to a single parent of three with a full-time job, to a faculty member who frequently travels abroad – PDA offers possibilities for “just in time” teaching, learning and research resources in a way that may not otherwise be possible.

PDA also meets the current generation of traditional college students “where they’re at,” simply because it mirrors the world they know.   Circulation of print books appears to be decreasing significantly among younger library users, who are born into a Web 2.0 world, and for whom “just in time” information almost appears to be a birthright!  Citing a 2010 study by the Cornell University Task Force on Print Collection Usage, Lugg (2011) shares a statistic indicating that “only 10.5% of books checked out from Cornell’s libraries were in the hands of undergraduates” (p. 10).  For academic libraries to keep up with young undergraduates – and therefore the graduate student and faculty populations that will grow from within those ranks – PDA indeed appears to have tremendous promise!


PDA creates space for the patrons!

Rick Lugg (2011) offers us the important and inspiring reminder that even as fewer and fewer young library users may be accessing the print collecti0n, they continue to gather regularly at the library:  “library gate counts are rising, as students congregate in the library to study, work together, visit the writing center and drink coffee.  On most campuses, the library remains an important hub, irrespective of collection use.  Information commons, teaching and learning centers, group study space, information fluency, and other programs are in high demand" (p. 8).  Librarians have an opportunity to foster teaching and learning in new and important ways, as we seek to carefully balance our collection development procedures between print resources and the myriad offerings available through PDA.  Simply put, space that is not taken up by books, journals and other print materials can – and likely will – be occupied by students, teachers and researchers, actively engaging each other (and librarians, too!) in learning community.


PDA has the potential to save libraries time and money.

Steiner and Berry (2011) encourage us that “adopting the PDA model is a great help in building a new library quickly and with vast financial and time savings” (p. 80).  Indeed, there are significant costs (in both money and time) associated with the building and management of a print collection; for instance, there is the cost of purchasing, shipping, customs clearance (in some cases), processing, shelving and stacks maintenance, preservation, and more – and, of course, the staffing needs for all of these important tasks.  PDA, on the other hand, offers a great deal of flexibility, along with the opportunity to build a collection with far more breadth and depth than a library’s print collection might provide, “and it can be done at little financial risk,” and in far less time (Steiner and Berry, 2011, p. 93).

There is, of course, no guarantee that PDA will ultimately cost less than a traditional “just in case” collection development model; patron-selected materials may vary significantly in terms of cost-per-item, and individual libraries may indeed have to filter their PDA offerings in order to stretch their dollars toward the best possible outcomes (Shen, 2011, p. 214).   However – as Rick Anderson (2011) reminds us – even if the actual collection-building costs of PDA are comparable to more traditional methods, PDA will nonetheless help to ensure that the money we spend will go directly to information that our patrons actually need.  What is more, releasing some of the funds that would otherwise go towards a more traditional collection development model allows a library to allocate its funds in more creative ways, to meet the needs and interests of patrons in a 21st century teaching and learning environment!


PDA may be a key player in the transformation of libraries!

There will be more on this in another post – but it’s important to touch upon here, as a final shout out to the promise of PDA.   Again, patron-driven acquisitions is not a panacea for all of a library’s challenges, nor is it the ultimate path to meeting a library’s hopes and dreams for the future.  But, with all of the potential benefits that PDA offers – from meeting patrons’ actual information needs and meeting them “where they’re at;” to creating space in the budget and in the building itself for new programs, places and possibilities; to fostering access to and the freedom of information – PDA is indeed a promising way forward.  For PDA can help to ensure that rather than simply being a “warehouse for unused books,” our academic and research libraries will instead remain a “vital part of teaching, learning and research outcomes” (Lugg, 2011, p. 9).

References

Anderson, R. (2011). What Patron-Driven Acquisition (PDA) Does and Doesn’t Mean: An FAQ.  The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/05/31/what-patron-driven-acquisition-pda-does-and-doesnt-mean-an-faq/

Lugg, R. (2011).  Collecting for the Moment: Patron-Driven Acquisitions as a Disruptive Technology.  In David A. Swords (Ed.), Patron-Driven Acquisitions: History and Best Practices (pp. 7-22).  Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Saur.

Nixon, J., Freeman, R. and Ward, S. (2010). Patron-Driven Acquisitions: An Introduction and Literature Review. Collection Management (35:3-4), pp. 119-124.

Shen, L., Cassidy, E., Elmore, E., Griffin, G., Manolovitz, T., Martinez, M., & Turney, L. (2011). Head first into the patron-driven acquisition pool: A comparison of librarian selections versus patron purchases. Journal Of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 23(3), 203-218.

Steiner, R. and R. Berry (2011).  Building New Libraries on the International Stage: The Near and Middle East.  In David A. Swords (Ed.), Patron-Driven Acquisitions: History and Best Practices (pp. 79-93).  Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Saur.

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

A PDA Primer


What if you could be in charge of what books the library buys?  Many patrons would love to have this power and libraries, particularly academic libraries, are beginning to put in to place ways for their users to do this.

Traditionally, librarians have made the majority of decisions about what resources to purchase for their institution based on a variety of factors- how much money is budgeted for new books; what are the perceived needs of the community; what will create a well-rounded and comprehensive collection.  This is often called “just-in-case” acquisitions (Shen, 2011).  The librarian thinks that someone may need this resource in the near or long term and so they purchase it.  This results in a collection where almost 40% of new books do not circulate (Fischer 2012).

Patron-driven acquisitions (PDA) is an attempt to address the problems that arise at the root of making educated guesses about what patrons will use at the very root of issue- the guessing.  Some of the libraries budget would be set aside for books or other resources bought only after a patron requests them.  Up until about a decade ago, this meant that a physical book would be ordered and the patron could check it out whenever it arrived.  However, with the rise of digital books and journals, the form that most PDA takes has shifted to immediately purchasing an e-book or journal article when a patron selects it out of the catalog (Shen 2011).  This is both a shift in the process of acquiring materials for the library’s collection and a change in the philosophy of the way acquisitions should happen. Instead of an expert librarian picking out the books, patrons do. 

There are a variety of forms PDA can take.  The simplest is for a library to have a policy that if a patron requests a book they do not have they will immediately order.  The newest form, that academic libraries seem very excited about, is PDA of e-books.  This system almost completely removes the librarian from the process once parameters are in place.  The library sets up an agreement with a provider of academic e-books and possibly sets up some guidelines about what titles will be offered, the maximum amount to be spent on one book, subject matter restrictions or banning purchasing of duplicates.  The thousands of books available for purchase are then imported to the library’s catalog and appear identically to other electronic resources the institution owns.  If a patron crosses a certain amount of use, such as looking at ten or more pages of the book, the library is charged and now owns an electronic copy of that text (Shen 2011).

There are several positive and negative things about this approach to acquisitions, which this blog will explore more deeply in later posts.  This “just in time” approach makes some librarians nervous about what kind of materials their collection will end up acquiring.  Will the materials be of poor quality or not be applicable to anyone besides the person who purchased it?  Librarians are concerned that by buying what is most popular at the moment they will not be buying things of lasting value.  This approach also results in less of a sense of control over one’s budget.  Publishers are also concerned that this on demand buying pattern will result in less purchases by libraries (Anderson 2011).

However, proponents of PDA point out that materials bought in this way are much more likely to be checked out again than materials that librarians choose to purchase (Shen 2011).  Also, this often results in holes or weak spots in the collection being filled.  In academic libraries that budget by subject area there are often areas that are overlooked or left out of the budget process and PDA can help direct resources to those areas if there is a need in the community for them (Fischer 2012).

This blog will go on to consider more deeply the possibilities of PDA, pros and cons to the PDA approach to collection building in both academic and public libraries, the publisher’s perspectives and where this technology and approach is heading in the future.  

As we move forward we invite you to consider and discuss these questions:
-Given this brief outline, what is your impression of PDA as a way to acquire books for a library’s collection?
-Have you ever had a library buy a material specifically for you?  How did that work?
-How might the context of an academic library versus a public library matter in acquiring materials in this way?


References
Anderson, R. (2011). What Patron-Driven Acquisition (PDA) Does and Doesn’t Mean: An FAQ.  The Scholarly Kitchen. Retrieved from http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/05/31/what-patron-driven-acquisition-pda-does-and-doesnt-mean-an-faq/

Fischer, K., Wright, M., Clatanoff, K., Barton, H., & Shreeves, E. (2012). Give 'Em What They Want: A One-Year Study of Unmediated Patron-Driven Acquisition of e-Books. College & Research Libraries, 73(5), 469-492. Retrieved form http://proxy.lib.wayne.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ofs&AN=79814634&site=eds-live&scope=site

Shen, L., Cassidy, E., Elmore, E., Griffin, G., Manolovitz, T., Martinez, M., & Turney, L. (2011). Head first into the patron-driven acquisition pool: A comparison of librarian selections versus patron purchases. Journal Of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 23(3), 203-218. Retrieved from http://proxy.lib.wayne.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-80052995216&site=eds-live&scope=site